Power corrupts. It is all a power struggle. Own your power. Be powerful.
For most of us, the idea of power is sticky. Some see power as an entitlement, a zero-sum game with specific winners and losers. Others believe in collaboration, communal, shared power where everyone wins and loses together. Almost never do we think about power neutrally – as a force that just is. Inevitably, we bring our own idiosyncrasies, biases, worldviews and connotations to the party.
Your approach to power and all that it means to you underlies everything in your creative business. To find success, you have to know what your relationship to power is, how you intend to wield it when you have it and what you do when you do not.
Of course, the discussion begins with your own sense of internal power, confidence and willingness to stand tall for your art and creative business. For purposes of this post, however, I am taking this as a given. Huge assumption, I know, but go with me. Instead, my question is where you, your art and your creative business fall on the zero-sum to collaboration spectrum, the take it or earn it scale.
If you think power is ugly, you might find yourself running from it while at the same time grabbing it. This is my fifty percent deposit example. Unless you are selling a specific product like an existing dress or a chair, the very notion of taking a fifty percent deposit for an item that will require a process to create and produce is hyper-aggressive. You have not done a thing to earn the deposit and your reputation and/or referrals are not worth that much. You want the power but are afraid it will disappear, so you take it. With fifty percent of a client’s money, they are not going anywhere without a lot of pain. No judgment here, just perspective that you will have power you have not yet earned. Inevitably, how you then wield that power will be a response, and not in itself generative. Whether it is a “trust me, I know what I am doing”, let me go overboard to show you how you made the right choice, or somewhere in between, you are living in the idea that you just took something.
Compare those that see power as immutable and transferable for a purpose. They want a client to decide to give power as validation of the request. The client likes your idea so they pay with their power (and money) for you to continue. Then again, those on the collaboration side of the spectrum can take it too far and one pot of power becomes an unmanageable mess. Leadership is required and if you are constitutionally against taking it if need be, you may never get done. Leadership is required, even if leadership constantly shifts.
To take it out of client relationship, think about the continuing evolution of corporate structure. The digital age has hampered the very notion of the traditional pyramid, especially for creative businesses. Interconnectivity makes it very hard to have defined groups with power layers both within the group and the organization as a whole as the sole operating structure. Bob reports to Sally in accounting and Sally reports to Fred, the Chief Operating Officer, who reports to Jane, the CEO is mostly a function of a time when talking to everyone at the same time was not possible.
Instead, the idea of the organization as an atom is now ever possible. There are defined roles as neutrons and electrons, but freedom to move about the nucleus within those roles. A nod to Liene Stevens, Millennials wriggle against the pyramid and thrive in an atom. Everyone has a voice meant to be heard equally. Underlying the worldview is perspectives on power.
The work today has to be to identify where we all are in relation to power. Know how it shapes us, even dictates the direction and structure of our art and creative business. From there we can all evolve our own place on the spectrum and see where that can take us.
{ 1 comment }
First, thanks you for this post, your insight and constant, consistent delivery of valid arguments, thoughtful discussion and well-put analysis of the creative business and its methods of achieving worth.
I’ve been reading you for some time now and notice that notion of requesting/requiring a 50% deposit is something that you have quite an opinion on. Honestly, I’ve had difficulty in determining where you’re for or againt this policy, but I tend to believe it’s more the latter.
I was wondering if you might entertain the idea of dedicating one of your next posts to this topic and giving opinions and critiques of a couple of deposit models. I certainly have my own views on this policy, but I (and I believe many of your readers) would very much like k hear your opinion.
Thanks again for the great reads.
JB